Skip to content

#astrophysics

Post a problem
20 problems Language English ×

Why do measurements of the universe's current expansion rate (the Hubble constant) using the early universe (cosmic microwave background plus the standard cosmological model) consistently give a lower value (~67-68 km/s/Mpc) than measurements using nearby stars and supernovae (~73 km/s/Mpc)?

Why did NASA's Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft, as they left the solar system in the 1980s-90s, experience a tiny unexplained extra deceleration (about 8.7 x 10^-10 m/s^2) toward the Sun that didn't match standard gravitational predictions?

Why did several NASA and ESA spacecraft (including Galileo, NEAR, Cassini, and Rosetta) show small unexplained changes in speed (a few mm/s) during close Earth gravity-assist flybys in the 1990s-2000s, beyond what standard orbital mechanics predicts?

What is dark matter actually made of — is it a new fundamental particle (like a WIMP or axion) that barely interacts with ordinary matter, or does the evidence for it instead point to gravity itself working differently than Einstein and Newton predicted on galactic scales?

What is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate — is it a constant vacuum energy density (the cosmological constant), a dynamical field (quintessence) that changes over time, or a sign that general relativity itself needs modification on cosmic scales?

Missing baryon problem Research level Physics astrophysics archive 8 Jan 2026 Unsolved

Where is the roughly 30-40% of the universe's ordinary (baryonic) matter that Big Bang nucleosynthesis and cosmic microwave background measurements predict should exist, but which could not be directly observed in stars, galaxies, and cold gas in the more recent universe?